Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters

Database
Language
Document Type
Year range
1.
ACS Appl Bio Mater ; 6(1): 238-245, 2023 01 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2185490

ABSTRACT

Since the onset of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, the world has witnessed over 617 million confirmed cases and more than 6.54 million confirmed deaths, but the actual totals are likely much higher. The virus has mutated at a significantly faster rate than initially projected, and positive cases continue to surge with the emergence of ever more transmissible variants. According to the CDC, and at the time of this manuscript submission, more than 77% of all current US cases are a result of the B.5 (omicron). The continued emergence of highly transmissible variants makes clear the need for more effective methods of mitigating disease spread. Herein, we have developed an antimicrobial fabric capable of destroying a myriad of microbes including betacoronaviruses. We have demonstrated the capability of this highly porous and nontoxic metal organic framework (MOF), γ-CD-MOF-1, to serve as a host for varied-length benzalkonium chlorides (BACs; active ingredient in Lysol). Molecular docking simulations predicted a binding affinity of up to -4.12 kcal·mol-1, which is comparable to that of other reported guest molecules for this MOF. Similar Raman spectra and powder X-ray diffraction patterns between the unloaded and loaded MOFs, accompanied by a decrease in the Brunauer-Emmett-Teller surface area from 616.20 and 155.55 m2 g-1 respectively, corroborate the suggested potential for pore occupation with BAC. The MOF was grown on polypropylene fabric, exposed to a BAC-loading bath, washed to remove excess BAC from the external surface, and evaluated for its microbicidal activity against various bacterial and viral classes. Significant antimicrobial character was observed against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, bacteriophage, and betacoronavirus. This study shows that a common mask material (polypropylene) can be coated with BAC-loaded γ-CD-MOF-1 while maintaining the guest molecule's antimicrobial effects.


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents , COVID-19 , Metal-Organic Frameworks , Humans , Metal-Organic Frameworks/pharmacology , Metal-Organic Frameworks/chemistry , Molecular Docking Simulation , Surface-Active Agents , Polypropylenes , SARS-CoV-2
2.
Front Microbiol ; 12: 646303, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1268260

ABSTRACT

Recent advances in 3D printing have led to a rise in the use of 3D printed materials in prosthetics and external medical devices. These devices, while inexpensive, have not been adequately studied for their ability to resist biofouling and biofilm buildup. Bacterial biofilms are a major cause of biofouling in the medical field and, therefore, hospital-acquired, and medical device infections. These surface-attached bacteria are highly recalcitrant to conventional antimicrobial agents and result in chronic infections. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and medical officials have considered 3D printed medical devices as alternatives to conventional devices, due to manufacturing shortages. This abundant use of 3D printed devices in the medical fields warrants studies to assess the ability of different microorganisms to attach and colonize to such surfaces. In this study, we describe methods to determine bacterial biofouling and biofilm formation on 3D printed materials. We explored the biofilm-forming ability of multiple opportunistic pathogens commonly found on the human body including Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Staphylococcus aureus to colonize eight commonly used polylactic acid (PLA) polymers. Biofilm quantification, surface topography, digital optical microscopy, and 3D projections were employed to better understand the bacterial attachment to 3D printed surfaces. We found that biofilm formation depends on surface structure, hydrophobicity, and that there was a wide range of antimicrobial properties among the tested polymers. We compared our tested materials with commercially available antimicrobial PLA polymers.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL